Week 19 – Question of the Week: Do doctors seem scared by the medical establishment?

Week 19: 2011-08-12

This week I was thinking about all the rules with which physicians must comply.  Here’s a few off the top of my head:

Be licensed by state

Completely annual continuing education requirements according to license and specialty board requirements.

Hold a DEA license for controlled drug dispensing

Purchase malpractice insurance (for participation in most insurance plans)

Keep credentials up to date for each position, insurance, state, and board

Provide patients with HIPPA information

Use online prescribing this year or face a cut in Medicare payment in 2012

Begin using an EHR soon or face further Medicare cuts

Attest to lack of drug use, alcohol abuse, or criminal behavior

Pay child support or risk losing one’s medical license (a good thing?)

Comply with multiple chart audits

Now the question: do doctors seem scared by the medical establishment?

Comments, questions, and suggestions are all appreciated.  Submit your response in the block below.

– Doc Cindy

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Medical archives, Perennial Favorites, Question of the Week | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Photo Quiz Question – Q.004

Photo Quiz Question – Q.004 – August 5, 2011

23-year-old white male, who says he thinks he was stung by a bee while camping, but feels fine otherwise.

What does the above image depict?  Does he need a bee sting kit?  Is the patient contagious?

What should you do to prepare for a similar affliction?

To be honest, submit your response in the box below before turning to the answer.

The answer will be posted August 12, 2011 at: http://armageddonmedicine.net/?p=4964.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Bites-insect-bug-tick, Injuries, Medical archives, Perennial Favorites, Photo Quiz Questions, Rash, Skin, Skin infection, Symptoms | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Week 18 – Question of the Week: Does the government help or hinder personal preparedness?

Week 18: 2011-08-05

Recently my mother was watching the National Governors Association television broadcast.  She was surprised (and pleased) that at least one governor advised taking action for personal preparedness, even if only to assure survival a few weeks.

So for today’s question: do you feel your federal, state, or local government helps or hinders personal preparedness?

Comments, questions, and suggestions are all appreciated.  Submit your response in the block below.

– Doc Cindy

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Education, Medical archives, Perennial Favorites, Question of the Week | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Week 17 – Question of the Week: Do you want your personal health information on the internet?

Week 17: 2011-07-28

Few people realize that their computerized medical files may be on the internet.

With one goal of electronic health records being easier communication from doctor to doctor, and with the need for a universal method of such communication, isn’t this inevitable?

If you knew that your personal files were being stored on the internet for easier (and perhaps universal) access, what would you say?  Of course, this information is encrypted, and only those with permission should have access, but even then, is this all right with you?

Comments, questions, and suggestions are all appreciated.  Submit your response in the block below.

– Doc Cindy

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Education, Medical archives, Question of the Week | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Herbal medicine – a new vision

I woke up this morning with a new vision of herbal medicine. (I’m not sure it really was a vision, but it came to me that way.)

God gave us the plant kingdom to feed us. I think we’re all pretty clear on that (and I’m glad he has a sweet tooth).

And to protect us. It wasn’t an accident that Jesus was a carpenter.  What is the single best building material in the world?  If you had to choose only one, wouldn’t it be wood?

And to heal us (and maybe more).  Here’s where things get muddy.

One more thing: in some way, much of this has been corrupted.

It’s like a whole barrage of things I’ve been studying lately fell into place.

Last spring I was teaching Sunday School and we did a little thought experiment: What would remain if all were right with the world? Think about your own neighborhood – what would be gone?  What would remain?

It’s easy to start with the obvious – no bars, no strip joints, no gambling storefronts.  Without trouble-makers, fires, and disease we’d need no police, no firemen, no hospitals, (and no government.)

What use would there be for doctors, or clergy, or tax-supported schools? No funeral homes, no drug stores, and perhaps no butchers.

Men weren’t made to drudge through life, doing the same old thing day after day.  So what would happen to coal mines, steel mills, off-shore drilling?  We know where mankind went wrong – on day one, more or less.  I don’t think we can even imagine where we would be if the world were filled with good.

Surely we wouldn’t need dentists – reason enough to rejoice, as I sit here with another thousand bucks of hardware in my mouth.

No tobacco shops, no tanning beds, no banks, maybe no football.  And no divorce courts or child abuse.

No churches, even.  Who would need them if God lived among us?

So what’s left? In my neighborhood the only thing my Sunday school class left standing was the ice cream shop.

Well, things aren’t right with the world, and some would say that’s just the way it is.  Evolutionists would think so.  But maybe that’s not the way things are.  Perhaps there are unseen powers battling it out over good and evil.

I was reading a book entitled In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation.  For one scientist, his belief was based on the apparent design seen within ecosystems, and how every component has a role and a purpose. Remove enough elements – sometimes only one – and the ecosystem collapses.

Does this mean that every plant has a purpose, or is it simply there, a stray seed blown by the wind, landing where it may?  I think most of us see the world this way.  Perhaps we’re wrong.

And then there’s C. S. Lewis, who said God has not given us desires that have no possibility of fulfillment.  Perhaps God has allowed no disease (other than death) without the possibility of a cure.

Remember when God looked at his creation and said it was good?  Is poison ivy good?  Not around me!  But perhaps it is good for something as yet unrecognized. Or perhaps the dermatitis it causes is due to corruption either within the plant or within our immune system.

Herbalists swear by the curative powers of jewel weed for poison ivy, though medical studies have not concurred.  But just because research does not confirm the benefit of a particular folk medicine does not mean it doesn’t work.  Perhaps the methodology was flawed, or the timing was off, or maybe the wrong part of the plant was used.

It’s a difficult job to sort out the snake oil from the truly effective.  Double-blind placebo-controlled studies are best at doing so, but are expensive, time-consuming, and unlikely to make it into the literature unless every “i” is dotted and every “t” is crossed. And in the medical world, if it’s not in a respected journal, few will listen.

As for medical prepping, it makes far more sense to learn how to use the plants that grow in your backyard than to stockpile herbs from China.

It also seems unlikely that God would wait until the 20th century to give us answers to disease, and unlikelier yet that he would reserve that power for big pharma.

Yet the scientific method is sorely needed in the realm of naturalistic healing.  The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) is trying to make sense of it all.

What does this all mean for me, or you? I’m looking at those dandelions in my yard differently now.  I know I could eat them (if I had to). I know the flowers can be made into wine. But according to NCCAM, “There is no compelling scientific evidence for using dandelion as a treatment for any medical condition.”

Well, maybe they’re wrong. And maybe I’ll have to help prove it.

Copyright © 2011 Cynthia J. Koelker, MD

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Herbal and complementary, Herbal medicine, Medications, Perennial Favorites | Tagged , , , , , , | 27 Comments

Lessons from Non-Compliant Patients

I have seen patients die – from uncontrolled hypertension, treatable urinary infections, curable pneumonia.

What do many of these patients have in common? Some (though not all) simply did not take their medicine.

It’s not that they didn’t have a remedy at hand – they just didn’t comply with medical advice, either out of negligence, misunderstanding, disbelief, financial restraints, or rebellion.  Doctors call these patients non-compliant.  Physicians do not want to be responsible for patients who will not take care of themselves, and often use the term “non-compliant” to document patient irresponsibility.

Fortunately, most patients who don’t take their medicine do not die. Continue reading

Posted in Antibiotics, Asthma, Asthma and COPD, Asthma/COPD, Blood pressure meds, Chronic diseases, COPD, COPD see Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, High blood pressure, Hypothyroidism, Lung disease, Medical archives, Medications, Prescription Medications, Thyroid disease, Thyroid preparations | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Photo Quiz Answer – Q.003

Photo Quiz Question – Q.003 – July 1, 2011

31-year-old white male, circa 1951, missionary to Nigeria

Illness started with fever and aching for 2-3 days, followed by development of blistering rash.  Above image depicts rash a week into the illness.

* * *

 Actually, I changed the date and location to raise the question: is this smallpox?

Of the answers received, Jim H. is correct – this is chicken pox.  It is often worse in an adult compared to a child.

Early rash of smallpox vs chickenpox: rash mos...

Image via Wikipedia

Rich S. is also correct in that smallpox does start on the face and radiate outward.  And as he points out, smallpox lesions do erupt in a single outbreak and thus should all be in a similar state of healing, unlike chicken pox which tends to erupt in waves over several days.

[Regarding other diagnoses suggested:  bad cases of poison ivy that I’ve seen on the face are either more confluent (for example, from smoke exposure due to burning poison ivy) or streakier (as in plant exposure).  Except in immune-compromised individuals, shingles follows the path of a single nerve, usually creating a band half-way around the torso. You shouldn’t see a case of shingles that looks like this in an otherwise healthy person.]

KF’s comments on small pox are also correct:  if this were smallpox, since the lesions do not all appear to be scabbed over, the patient would still be contagious and should be isolated with respiratory and contact precautions. 

Since this is actually chicken pox and not all lesions are scabbed, he is still contagious and should be isolated from individuals who have never had either the disease or varicella vaccine.  Anyone who has had shingles is immune to chicken pox.  Patients older than age 50 are eligible to receive the shingles vaccine (but should wait a year after an outbreak if they’ve had a case of shingles).

The image below is a case of smallpox.  (Public domain image from Wikipedia.)

None - This image is in the public domain and ...

Image via Wikipedia

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Chicken pox, Education, Medical archives, Perennial Favorites, Photo Quiz Answers, Rash, Skin infection, Smallpox, Symptoms | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Clinical Laboratory Procedures under Austere Conditions: Part IV – The Gram Stain

Could you diagnose anthrax on your own?  How about gonorrhea?  A Gram stain is often diagnostic, and can be performed with limited equipment.  

The following post on clinical laboratory procedures is contributed by Pete Farmer,  who holds advanced degrees in research biology and history, and is also an RN and EMT.  For Part I of the series, click HERE.

Thanks, Pete, for this timely article.

* * *

Images show sample Gram stains – What are they? – See key below.

* * *

Now that you understand the theory and practice of light microscopy at a more detailed level, as covered in the previous three installments of this series, it is time to perform a diagnostic staining technique.

Streptococcus mutans. Gram stain. Thioglycolla...

Image via Wikipedia

The Gram stain is the most commonly-used differential staining technique in microbiology; it is named after its inventor, Danish scientist Hans Christen Gram (1853-1938), who published his findings in 1884. Though well over a century old, the Gram stain remains a key part of the clinical microbiologist’s repertoire. Before getting to the staining procedure, some background will prove helpful.

The hidden world of microorganisms is vast; it contains not only a staggering number of individual microbes – bacteria, viruses, protozoans, and fungi – but a huge number of individual taxonomic types and subtypes. The first scientists to study microbes, therefore, had the daunting task of somehow making sense of the sometimes-bewildering array of microscopic life forms. They began the painstaking task of classifying microbes on the basis of all sorts of criteria, from their appearance under the microscope to where they were found in the natural world to their chemical and physical characteristics. Bacteria can be classified depending on what kind of growth medium they prefer, i.e., the substrate upon which an organism grows or to which it is attached; the metabolic end-products they secrete into the surrounding environment; and much more. Bacteriologists began devising chemical and physical tests to allow typing of individual bacteria or groups of bacteria; over time, researchers learned when and how to use these tests to differentiate between microbes. 

Gram stain of the bacteria Bordetella pertussis.

Image via Wikipedia

In 1923, “Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology” was published for the first time; updated annually; it remains a standard reference for identifying bacteria. In brief, the manual uses a comprehensive battery of known characteristics of bacteria, organized into a decision-tree or algorithm, to separate microbes into the broad groups (or families) and then narrows the identification down to a single type of bacterium over the course of subsequent tests. Very often, when a scientist or clinician is confronted with a sample suspected or known to contain unidentified bacteria, his or her first action will be to perform a Gram stain. The Gram stain is often necessary but insufficient to complete an identification or diagnosis; that is, an investigator will have to perform other tests to make a definitive identification. However, in other cases, knowing the Gram stain result for a given bacterial sample is all the information a physician needs to make an informed decision about whether or not to prescribe an antibiotic and which one to use. Modern molecular biology and medical diagnostics labs have sophisticated gene-sequencing and similar methods which have supplanted differential staining, owing to their higher degree of specificity, greater precision and accuracy and lesser incidence of identification errors and cross-reactivity. However, the basic Gram stain remains a very useful adjunct to its more-modern counterparts, especially for diagnosis under harsh conditions where high tech methods may not be available.

This low-resolution photomicrograph reveals th...

Image via Wikipedia

The basis of the Gram stain lies in the differing cell wall composition among different types of bacteria. Some bacteria have thick, mesh-like cell walls rich in peptidoglycans (a chemical polymer consisting of amino acids and sugar); these bacteria, referred to as Gram positive (+), stain violet/purple in the procedure. Bacteria possessing a thinner peptidoglycan coating and an endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) layer, referred to as Gram negative (-), stain red-to-pink.

Note: before proceeding, assemble the necessary supplies, chemical reagents, jars, slides, and other materials necessary to perform a Gram stain, as detailed in previous installments of this series, and according to the many published descriptions of the procedure. If making your own stain and counter-stain is too difficult or time-consuming, gram staining kits and reagents may be purchased premanufactured.

The following procedure is taken from the website, “Microbial Life Education Resources,” (http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/research_methods/microscopy/gramstain.html). This useful resource includes a short video clip of a Gram stain being done.  

Gram stain protocol

Reagents: Crystal violet (primary stain), Iodine solution/Gram’s Iodine (mordant that fixes crystal violet to cell wall), Decolorizer (e.g. ethanol), Safranin (secondary stain), Water (preferably in a squirt bottle)   

  1. Make a slide of cell sample to be stained. Heat fix the sample to the slide by carefully passing the slide with a drop or small piece of sample on it through a Bunsen burner three times.
  2. Add the primary stain (crystal violet) to the sample/slide and incubate for 1 minute. Rinse slide with a gentle stream of water for a maximum of 5 seconds to remove unbound crystal violet.
  3. Add Gram’s iodine for 1 minute- this is a mordant, or an agent that fixes the crystal violet to the bacterial cell wall.
  4. Rinse sample/slide with acetone or alcohol for ~3 seconds and rinse with a gentle stream of water. The alcohol will decolorize the sample if it is Gram negative, removing the crystal violet. However, if the alcohol remains on the sample for too long, it may also decolorize Gram positive cells.
  5. Add the secondary stain, safranin, to the slide and incubate for 1 minute. Wash with a gentle stream of water for a maximum of 5 seconds. If the bacterium is Gram positive, it will retain the primary stain (crystal violet) and not take the secondary stain (safranin), causing it to look violet/purple under a microscope. If the bacterium is Gram negative, it will lose the primary stain and take the secondary stain, causing it to appear red when viewed under a microscope. 

Bacteria are characterized in part by their morphology (structure and form). Cocci (singular = coccus) are spherical in form, and may appear in groups or two or more arranged in characteristic shapes. Paired spherical bacteria belong to the group (genus) Diplococci; the Streptococci are spherical and appear in chains; Staphylococci appear in large groups and may form distinct shapes. The causative agent of strep throat (Streptococcal pharyngitis) is a subtype of Streptococcal bacterial family known as the Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus. A second morphology is the bacillus (plural = bacilli) or rod-shaped bacterium. Escherichia coli is an example of a rod-shaped bacterial form. A third form is the spiral-shaped bacterium, or spirillum. Treponema pallidum, the causative agent of venereal disease syphilis, is an example of a spiral bacterial type.   

Combined with morphology, the gram stain is a powerful tool for characterizing bacteria for diagnostic purposes. Six common gram positive bacteria that infect humans are the staphylococci, streptococci, bacilli, clostridia, corynebacteria, and listeria types.  Examples of gram negative infectious agents which affect humans include the Spirochete and Neisseria types.   

Copyright © 2011 Peter Farmer

 IMAGE KEY

Top (large) image:  anthrax in CSF fluid (purple rods)

Image #2, toward right: streptococcus mutans

Image #3, toward left: bordatella pertussis (causes whooping cough)

Image #4, toward right: gonococcus (note organisms within cells)

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Contributors, Medical archives, Medical testing, Microscopic examination, Perennial Favorites, Pete Farmer | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Colloidal Silver – Free Download

The question of colloidal silver continues to pique the interest of those worried about treating infection post-Armageddon.

Prof.  Ronald J. Gibbs has an interesting web site on silver colloids, featuring a free download of a 40-page booklet.

He appears to be quite well-informed.  Download his free pdf booklet at: http://www.silver-colloids.com/Book/SilverColloids-s.pdf

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Antibacterial topical, Colloidal silver, Education, Free downloads, Medical archives, Perennial Favorites | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Thyroid disease – Hypothyroidism (low thyroid) – Part 5 of 5 – Rational treatment or cannibalism?

The veins of the thyroid gland.
Image via Wikipedia

At the end of the world as we know it, there is one other treatment option for hypothyroidism that I refrained from mentioning.

I am not aware that this treatment is practiced anywhere in the world, though it is certainly a possibility.  The availability of animals with similarly functioning thyroid glands has obviated the need to consider this option in the past.

However, if both Synthroid and animal-derived thyroid products become unavailable, what about the use of human thyroid tissue?

My immediate reaction is revulsion.  It’s one thing to take dessicated bovine or porcine thyroid tissue, package a  little in sterilized capsules, then ingest it as thyroid hormone replacement therapy.

But could the same be done with human tissue?  I believe so.  At TEOTWAWI one would expect plenty of people would be dead or dying.  Harvesting cadaver thyroid glands, much like kidneys and hearts are harvested for transplantation, is a consideration.  If I were dying and my child needed my thyroid in order to live, I would gladly have them benefit from an organ my corpse could not use.

Is it cannabalism to take another person’s thyroid gland and ingest it a tiny bit at a time?  The Armour thyroid package insert states that the normal human thyroid gland contains about 200 mcg of levothyroxine (T4) and 15 mcg of liothyronine (T4) per gram of gland.  For most patients, then, about half a gram of (undessicated) human thyroid tissue would suffice as daily replacement therapy.  (Dessicated weight should be only about 0.1 gram or 100 mg, similar to Armour thyroid dosing.)

Is this different than a blood transfusion or kidney transplant?  It feels different, somehow.  Does the need for a therapy to stay alive make it acceptable and/or moral?  The next logical question is, would the need for calories and protein to remain alive make cannibalism (not murder) acceptable or moral?

If ingesting human thyroid tissue is not acceptable, another theoretical possibility might be isolating thyroid hormones from donated plasma.  Yet surely the technology to accomplish this is less likely to exist after an Armageddeon event than the ability to harvest animal thyroid tissue.

I include this final option for the sake of completeness, and leave the question of morality to the reader.  This is just one of many heartrending questions those who survive may have to face after their friends and loved ones have died.

For more answers to your thyroid questions, see HYPOTHYROIDISM – Answers for the End of the World.

Copyright © 2010 Cynthia J. Koelker, MD

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Chronic diseases, Herbal and complementary, Hypothyroidism, Medical archives, Medications, Perennial Favorites, Thyroid, Thyroid disease | Tagged , , , , , , , | 12 Comments